Reverse Logistics Group

The ECCC Delays Phases 2 and 3 of the Federal Plastics Registry: What It Means

Anastasiia Kholodna — Tue, 23 Dec 2025 15:50:08 +0000

Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) recently sent an email to stakeholders announcing an important update about the Federal Plastics Registry (FPR). The message highlights both the progress of the Registry so far and a decision to delay reporting for Phases 2 and 3.

Here’s what you need to know—what’s changing, what’s not, and how organizations can prepare.

What is the Federal Plastics Registry?

The Federal Plastics Registry is a cornerstone in Canada’s approach to tackling plastic waste and pollution. It’s designed to capture data on plastic production, use, and management across the country, offering a clear picture of plastics throughout their entire lifecycle.

According to ECCC, this open-access data inventory supports Canada’s commitment to take ambitious, evidence-based action to protect the environment and move toward a circular economy for plastics.

What did the ECCC’s email say?

ECCC shared that it has received valuable feedback from stakeholders about the complexity and challenges associated with Phases 2 and 3 reporting. In response, and “to build a system that works better for everyone,” ECCC has decided to delay all reporting requirements for Phases 2 and 3 of the FPR.

This delay will:

Allow time to streamline and optimize reporting requirements.
Give organizations more opportunity to collect and report high-quality, consistent data.

ECCC also plans to amend the existing Notice to reflect these changes for the calendar years 2024, 2025, and 2026.

What does this mean for Phase 1 reporting?

If your organization is responsible for reporting under Phase 1, your requirements do not change. Producers of packaging, electronics, and electrical equipment, as well as single-use or disposable plastics destined for the residential waste stream, must still report data for the 2024, 2025, and 2026 calendar years as required under the current Notice.

For full details, refer to the Notice with respect to the reporting of plastic resins and certain plastic products for the Federal Plastics Registry for 2024, 2025 and 2026.

In other words: Phase 1 reporting continues without change with the 2025 data due September 29th, 2026.

What’s next for Phases 2 and 3?

ECCC is taking a phased approach to communicate next steps:

A Notice of Intent will be published in the Canada Gazette in Winter 2026, outlining ECCC’s plan to delay Phases 2 and 3.
A new Notice will follow in Summer 2026, setting out reporting requirements for the 2027, 2028, and 2029 calendar years.
Engagement opportunities will be offered throughout 2026, giving stakeholders the chance to provide input on updates to the FPR’s design and reporting structure.

ECCC will share more details about how and when engagement will occur in the coming months.

How can RLG help your organization?

As the reporting under Phase 1 continues without change, and the delay of Phases 2 and 3 gives organizations time to strengthen their data management frameworks, we can help you prepare for both. At RLG, our mission is to help producers meet their reporting obligations with ease.

We support organizations by managing data collection and submission for the Federal Plastics Registry, ensuring compliance and accuracy in reporting. We also help producers know what’s coming through Horizon Scanning, spotting upcoming regulatory changes and helping prepare for them well in advance.

RLG’s proactive approach means you stay informed, compliant, and strategically positioned as Canada’s plastics regulations continue to evolve.

Get support today

If your organization needs help preparing data for the Federal Plastics Registry or developing a strategy for upcoming reporting phases, we can help.

Contact us today to learn how RLG can support your Federal Plastics Registry compliance.

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. Laws are subject to interpretation and change without notice, so always consult with professional advisors and refer to primary sources. Content is accurate as of publication date but may not be regularly updated.

The post The ECCC Delays Phases 2 and 3 of the Federal Plastics Registry: What It Means appeared first on Reverse Logistics Group.

Driving Business Value Through Decarbonization

caroline.houghton@valpak.co.uk — Wed, 17 Dec 2025 12:03:36 +0000

Robust climate strategies do more than ensure compliance; they create tangible business value.

Companies that can report emissions transparently and present credible reduction plans gain a clear competitive edge. They stand out in tenders, attract sustainability-focused investors, and minimize exposure to carbon pricing and regulatory risks.

Early adopters are also better prepared for emerging frameworks governing sustainable product claims, frameworks that will soon make product-level Scope 3 reporting unavoidable. Such as the DPP (the EU’s upcoming Digital Product Passport) which aims to create a digital sustainability passport for products that contains information about their CO2 footprint, recyclability, etc. 

Future-proofing your climate strategy starts with having the right data foundation. Scope 3 Insights provides you with product-level emissions data and supply chain specific data insights to understand, steer and reduce your emissions.

Financial & Reputational Imperative

Investors, regulators, and customers are closely monitoring how organizations manage climate risks, emissions, and their readiness for a low-carbon future.

Credible data increases investor confidence improves ESG Ratings and enables better access to capital and lower financing costs. 

With supply chain emissions on average 26x greater than operation emissions, companies must drive transparency and action down the supply chain to reduce impacts and future-proof their business.1

Return on Investment in Climate Action

Failing to address climate-related risks in supply chains can cost companies up to three times more than implementing mitigation measures, according to CDP market analysis. Proactive action delivers both business resilience and cost savings.1

Direct financial benefits come from supply chain initiatives such as adopting low-carbon energy, for example by purchasing Renewable Energy Certificates on behalf of suppliers, by improving processes, and innovating low-carbon products.

These measures also reduce exposure to carbon pricing, regulatory penalties, and trade barriers. In 2026, Germany’s National Emissions Trading System (nEHS) will shift to a price corridor of €55–€65 per ton of CO₂. In the waste management sector, this directly impacts logistics and treatment costs, with current charges at €55 per ton of CO₂ for waste-derived fuels. Waste producers can lower costs by diverting materials to recycling.

Turning data transparency into an Advantage

Uncovering efficiency and cost-saving opportunities in supply chains requires supplier-specific, activity-based data. Companies that calculate product-level emissions are four times more likely to experience significant decarbonization benefits.2

Financial and industry-average approaches on the other hand allow for broad comparisons but fall short in accurately reflecting emissions and can obscure real reductions achieved at the supplier level. A key limitation is their tendency to prioritize price over actual environmental performance, which can discourage sustainability investments.

For instance, if a company opts for a greener product that costs more, its reported emissions might increase, even though its true environmental impact decreases. Organizations that incorporate supplier-specific data are better equipped to track progress, focus interventions, and manage risks across their value chains.3

Supply Chain Resilience

ectors such as the automotive industry are heavily dependent on imported critical raw materials, which creates significant supply risks and exposure to trade tariffs. One mitigation strategy is to source recycled materials; however, this approach faces challenges such as the loss of critical raw materials during recycling due to contamination and design choices that limit circularity. To address these issues, companies should increase transparency in end-of-life processes to identify opportunities for improved sorting, invest in advanced recycling technologies, and implement circular design principles to enhance material recovery and reduce contamination.

Where Scope 3 Insights Comes In

Scope 3 Insights provides companies clarity to turn complex value-chain data into clear, actionable insights. It helps organizations

Track products and materials movements at their end of life.

Replace emission estimates with verified supplier data.

Identify emission hotspots and efficiency opportunities.

Align with EU Taxonomy, Product Carbon Footprints, and Digital Product Passport standards.

The Takeaway

Strong environmental performance is now a strategic business priority. Transparent Scope 3 data and proactive climate investment open doors to better financing, stronger partnerships, and long-term resilience.

Scope 3 Insights makes this possible by providing a solid foundation to strengthen environmental performance through improved data quality ensuring your business remains prepared for what’s next.

Sources:

1 CDP Europe Report, 2024: Strengthening the chain.

2Carbon Survey 2024 by CO2 AI & BCG

3MIT’s Center for Transportation and Logistics: 2025 State Sustainable Supply Chains

The post Driving Business Value Through Decarbonization appeared first on Reverse Logistics Group.

Global EPR & Circular Economy Trends for 2025–2026

caroline.houghton@valpak.co.uk — Fri, 12 Dec 2025 09:43:54 +0000

As 2025 comes to a close, sustainability and environmental compliance have shifted from abstract goals to practical, everyday considerations for companies across the world. While political and regulatory pushbacks have created some uncertainty this year, the overall trend remains steadfast: what was once a “nice to have” has now become fully ingrained into business strategies. Regulations are tightening, expectations are rising, and producers are being asked to take clearer responsibility for the materials they introduce into the market. What once felt optional is now firmly part of operational planning and long-term strategy.

This year brought continued evolution in Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and related policies. Europe pushed forward with ambitious packaging reforms, North America expanded its state and provincial programs, and Latin America accelerated its transition toward circularity. Together, these developments outline a global trajectory that will shape how businesses prepare for 2026 and beyond.

Europe Leads the Way in Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)

Europe remains at the forefront of environmental regulation. Over the past year, companies have been adapting to new requirements that touch packaging, batteries, textiles, and corporate reporting frameworks.

The Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation is nearing finalization and companies are preparing for new rules that strengthen accountability for reuse, recyclability and the overall environmental performance of packaging placed on the market. At the same time, the gradual rollout of the European Battery Regulation is prompting businesses to evaluate product footprints, integrate recycled materials and strengthen supply chain transparency.

Corporate reporting is undergoing its own transformation. Early adopters of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) have submitted their first disclosures following the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), demonstrating how data-driven sustainability can be integrated into traditional business processes. The shift is encouraging companies to improve internal systems so that environmental data becomes as reliable and auditable as financial information.

Textile EPR and Circular Economy Compliance in Europe

One of the most significant developments of the year is the proposal to introduce Extended Producer Responsibility for textiles through updates to the Waste Framework Directive. Europe has long identified textiles as a high-impact material stream due to low collection rates, inconsistent recycling infrastructure and the growing volume of fast fashion. The inclusion of textile EPR represents a turning point for the industry and signals a stronger effort to address waste at its source.

Alongside Textiles EPR, the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) links directly to these requirements by defining eco-design criteria and eco-modulation rules for fees under EPR. ESPR also introduces Digital Product Passports, which will affect textiles as well as other sectors, such as batteries, and establishes a ban on the destruction of unsold goods.

Countries are now preparing for phased implementation that focuses on building national collection systems, encouraging fiber-to-fiber recycling, and improving product traceability. Brands and retailers are beginning to evaluate design practices and material choices to ensure products can be recovered more easily. They are also exploring take-back programs, reuse initiatives, and partnerships with recyclers to support compliance once national systems go live.

Key milestones to watch are June 2027, when all EU member states must transpose the legislation into national law, and April 2028, when EPR must be fully operative across the EU. While this transition will not happen overnight, the groundwork being laid in 2025 positions Europe to establish a more consistent and efficient approach to textile waste by 2026 and beyond.

North America EPR Trends and Regulatory Updates 2025–2026

Momentum in the United States continues to build as state level packaging programs advance from policy to implementation. Maine and Oregon are finalizing registration processes and fee structures for producers. California’s SB 54 now requires a 25% reduction in plastic packaging by 2032, alongside funding for statewide recycling programs, and the state has also passed the Responsible Textile Recovery Act (SB 707), establishing the nation’s first EPR law specific to textiles. New York continues to advance its Packaging Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act, which could significantly reshape producer responsibilities once enacted.

The Canadian EPR landscape continues to mature. In 2026, provinces like Saskatchewan and New Brunswick are set to expand the scope of electronics covered under EPR regulations. Notably, Saskatchewan will become only the second province, after British Columbia, to designate medical and monitoring devices. Battery and lighting EPR will also come into effect in New Brunswick, following their initial announcement in 2024.

Late in the year, British Columbia introduced several amendments to its Recycling Regulation, including new definitions and additional product categories, as the province seeks to refine its EPR framework with an eye toward 2027.

2026 will also mark the second year of the Federal Plastics Registry Report, which is set to expand reporting obligations to the ICI sector and to additional product categories such as construction materials and textiles.

Together, these developments bring North America closer to a more consistent, circular approach to resource management. Companies that prepare now will find themselves ahead of the curve.

Latin America: Emerging Leadership in EPR

Latin America is close behind, aligning policies with international best practices. Chile continues to lead with its EPR Law, in particular for WEEE and batteries, for which the draft regulation, requiring producers to meet collection and recycling targets, was published mid-2025.

Uruguay’s national packaging recovery initiative, Plan Vale, partnered with CIEMSA, CSI, and RLG to launch the country’s first Deposit Return System (DRS) for single-use beverage containers. This pioneering project makes Uruguay the first Latin American nation to adopt such a system. Colombia and Mexico are also implementing regulations focused on packaging waste, plastic reduction, and recycled content.

These programs show that circular economy principles are becoming central in the region, balancing environmental responsibility with economic and social goals.

Looking Ahead: Preparing for 2026

As companies prepare for 2026, it is becoming clear that global EPR systems are moving toward greater coordination and consistency. Regulators are also beginning to shift their expectations from basic disclosure to measurable performance. In practical terms, businesses are finding that strong sustainability reporting must be paired with tangible improvements in product design, material choices and end of life recovery. To achieve this, companies will need clear and detailed insights into their supply chains to identify opportunities for these improvements. Expectations surrounding reuse, recyclability and recycled content will become more visible and more quantifiable over the next year.

Digital reporting and product level traceability are emerging as core elements of environmental compliance. Companies will need a centralized data system and improve supplier engagement so that information can move smoothly through the value chain.

The rise of digital product passports and similar tools will accelerate during 2026 as governments seek better oversight of materials and as consumers demand clearer information about the products they purchase.

Circular design is becoming a foundational expectation rather than a niche practice. Regulators are paying closer attention to unnecessary packaging, non recyclable materials and product features that make disassembly or repair difficult. These pressures are encouraging businesses to evaluate design practices earlier in their development cycles, often resulting in cost savings as well as improved environmental performance.

With these trends converging, many companies are choosing to work more closely with external partners who can help interpret regulatory changes, assess exposure and translate sustainability goals into actionable steps. Expertise in EPR mapping, material assessments and supplier coordination is becoming increasingly valuable as organizations navigate more complex compliance environments.

Partnering for Progress

At RLG, we help businesses stay ahead of evolving EPR and environmental compliance regulations. Through our environmental compliance service, including Horizon Scanning and EPR Assessments, we provide insights and practical strategies to turn sustainability into real business value.

As 2025 comes to a close, the global push for circularity, transparency, and compliance is stronger than ever and shaping the way businesses operate worldwide. Organizations that prepare now will be ready to lead as new expectations unfold throughout 2026 and beyond.

The post Global EPR & Circular Economy Trends for 2025–2026 appeared first on Reverse Logistics Group.

CBAM 2026: Key simplification updates

caroline.houghton@valpak.co.uk — Wed, 10 Dec 2025 13:10:11 +0000

As we approach the end of the year, the EU Carbon Border Adjustment (CBAM) is undergoing a significant amount of changes ahead of its definitive implementation with an overwhelming amount of updates. It can be hard to keep track of what’s officially been adopted and what’s a leaked rumour. This blog walks you through the officially adopted simplifications and details how they may affect your businesses.

What is CBAM?

CBAM is the EU’s policy tool to prevent “carbon leakage” by applying a tax on carbon-intensive imports and align them with locally produced goods. As complexities piled up, the EU publicised a simplification package in February (the Omnibus I package) to reduce the regulatory burden while keeping the framework’s core climate goals intact. EU simplifications were officially adopted in October, changing several key aspects of CBAM.

What are the official simplifications?

These are the simplifications officially adopted by the EU Commission on the 21^st October 2025.

1. De minimis threshold

A de minimis limit of 50 tonnes now applies to importers bringing in Annex I products (iron and steel, aluminium, fertilisers and cement).

This limit excludes imports of hydrogen or electricity, which remain fully subject to CBAM rules.

Implications:

Smaller consignments of Annex I goods may fall outside annual CBAM reporting, easing compliance for low-volume traders (mainly small and medium businesses)
Importers of electricity and hydrogen must prepare for full CBAM obligations regardless of shipment size.

2. Authorised Declarant status & delegation

Importers anticipating volumes above the de minimis threshold must obtain Authorised CBAM Declarant status.
Import activities may continue through 2026 provided the authorisation request is filed by 31 March 2026.
Responsibilities may be delegated to an external representative (e.g., consultants) that fulfil specific conditions such as holding an EORI number and being established in an EU Member State. The importer, however, retains legal accountability.

Implications:

Businesses approaching or exceeding the threshold must secure authorisation early to avoid customs disruptions.
Delegation can ease administrative pressure, but governance controls are essential since accountability does not shift to the representative.

3. Certificates, submissions & timing

Annual CBAM declarations are due 30 September of the year following the import period.
CBAM certificates become available for purchase in 2027, covering emissions attributed to 2026.
The requirement for certificates has been reduced from 80% of embedded emissions to 50% throughout the year.
In some cases, verified data from the prior year may be applied for comparable goods from the same origin.

Implications:

Compliance planning and cash-flow projections must reflect the later start to certificate purchasing and the reduced certificate coverage.
Companies reliant on supplier data will need timely verification processes to meet the reporting deadline.
Reuse of verified historical data may streamline reporting for stable supply chains.

4. Emissions calculation & scope refinements

For selected aluminium and steel items, emissions accounting focuses largely on precursor inputs, which means that finishing steps outside the ETS may be omitted, except for integrated operations.
Precursor materials already priced under the ETS or linked regimes must not be counted twice.
The Commission will publish default emissions figures, meaning that verification is only needed where actual values are used instead.
Items in Annex II require reporting of direct emissions only.
Non-kaolinic clays are removed from scope.

Implications:

Narrowed emissions boundaries may simplify data gathering for downstream processors.
Avoiding double accounting is essential to ensure certificate quantities are calculated correctly.
Default values provide a fallback for importers lacking granular data, though companies with lower real-world emissions may prefer verified actuals.

5. Carbon price deductions & verifiers

Each year, the Commission will publish the average effective carbon price (€/tCO₂e) paid in non-EU jurisdictions.
Importers may claim reductions in required certificates for carbon costs paid abroad, as long as these relate to emissions not already covered under the ETS or an aligned pricing mechanism.
Verification must be carried out by accredited legal entities consistent with the original CBAM rules and Regulation (EU) 2018/2067, with verifier access to the CBAM registry.

Implications:

The accuracy and availability of verified foreign carbon-price data will directly influence certificate obligations.
Improper deductions could increase compliance exposure, making documentation and verification essential.
Demand for accredited verifiers may create capacity pressures, favouring early engagement.

6. Penalties & compliance risk

Unauthorised imports exceeding the threshold will trigger penalties equal to the full volume of embedded emissions, and payment of those penalties removes the requirement to submit a declaration.
Minor or unintentional errors (e.g., reliance on inaccurate third-party information) may result in reduced penalties.
Minor infringements (such as importing after authorisation is rejected) may also qualify for reduced penalties.

Implications:

Failure to secure Authorised Declarant status on time carries significant financial risk, potentially exceeding certificate costs.
Documented due diligence and supplier-data controls can help demonstrate good-faith errors and mitigate penalties.
Repeated or systemic issues may still attract heightened scrutiny despite reduced penalties for isolated minor infringements.

What this means for your business

If you import small quantities (under ~50 tonnes/year) of covered goods, you may now fall outside the full CBAM scope, meaning substantially reduced reporting and administrative effort.

If you operate above that threshold, or you import hydrogen or electricity, the core CBAM duties still apply, but the streamlined measures (longer lead times, the ability to delegate tasks, reuse of last year’s verified data, reduced certificate coverage, etc.) offer meaningful relief.

In short: many traders will benefit from a lighter compliance load, but CBAM remains significant for higher-volume importers and for sectors where the threshold doesn’t apply.

What to do next

Review your product list: Confirm whether your imports fall under CBAM’s scope (iron and steel, aluminium, fertilisers, cement, hydrogen, electricity).

Assess your quantities: Determine whether you sit below or above the 50-tonne threshold, and whether you may cross it in future years.

Secure emissions data: Ensure access to supplier emissions information, verified values where applicable, and any carbon pricing applied in the country of origin.

Plan for Authorised Declarant status: Decide whether you need it and whether to involve an accredited third-party representative.

Prepare for certificates and reporting: Build internal processes for registry use, certificate management, and meeting the 30 September annual deadline from 2026 onward.

How can RLG help?

RLG can support your business with:

Obligation identification to pinpoint obligated goods
Online supplier surveys to easily gather embedded emissions data
Internal pre-verifications to ensure accuracy ahead of time
Report submissions on your behalf to save you time
Cost forecasting to understand the financial impacts on your business

Visit our CBAM webpage to explore how our services can help you navigate CBAM compliance, or click here to get in touch today.

The post CBAM 2026: Key simplification updates appeared first on Reverse Logistics Group.

California’s 2026 Baseline Packaging Data Reports

Anastasiia Kholodna — Fri, 05 Dec 2025 19:19:01 +0000

California’s EPR rulemaking is about to create a compressed, two-step reporting cycle for producers, and packaging teams need to plan now for a February 2026 “baseline update” of their original 2025 baseline submission back in November.

Why California’s 2026 Packaging Data Baseline Report Matters

California’s packaging EPR regulations are expected to be approved around January 9, 2026, which starts a 30-day countdown for producers to file an updated 2026 Baseline Producer Report. This second baseline is not a new dataset, it still uses 2023 data as required by the regulation, it is an adjustment step triggered by the finalization of regulations so producers can align their figures with any last-minute regulatory changes.

For producers, the 2025 baseline you submitted first is being used by the Circular Action Alliance (CAA) to build and refine the program plan due to the state in June, and the state required 2026 baseline update is your opportunity to make sure your official numbers match the final regulation.

2025 vs. 2026 California Baseline Reports

The key distinction between the 2025 and 2026 California baseline reports is timing, not scope. Both rely on supply packaging data from the 2023 calendar year, capturing what packaging you placed on the California market, but they are anchored to different milestones in the regulatory process.

The 2025 California Baseline Producer Report was due to CAA by November 15, 2025, so the PRO has enough time to consolidate data and build its program plan for submission by June 15.
The 2026 California Baseline Producer Report is a separate filing required by the state due within 30 days after the regulations are finalized, most likely in February 2026.

In practice, producers will need to revisit their 2023 data after the regulations are approved and either confirm “my data is good” or adjust it to reflect new definitions, categorizations, or thresholds introduced in the final ruling.

What To Do Next

Once the regulations are finalized, producers will log into the California reporting portal and treat the 2026 baseline as a confirmation and correction step. If the original 2025 baseline aligns with the final requirements, the producer still needs to submit that confirmation as a distinct report; if not, they must update the data and resubmit within the same tight 30-day window.

Operationally, this puts pressure on data governance. Producers should come into 2026 with a clean, well-documented baseline dataset and clear ownership across finance, sustainability, and packaging teams so that any required tweaks to component mapping, material definitions, or scope can be made quickly. Treating the 2025 baseline as a dress rehearsal and the 2026 baseline as the audited version tied to finalized regulations. This will help avoid last-minute scrambles and potential compliance gaps.

How To Get Help with Packaging Data Reporting and EPR Compliance in California

RLG is a global provider of EPR compliance services, with staff located in the United States, including California. Strong relationships with regulators, plus over 30 years of experience, puts RLG at the forefront of compliance, and our sterling reputation is fueled by our commitment to decreasing risk.

We also offer packaging data management, with data collection and analysis, and our packaging database has over 60 million SKUs that can be leveraged for accuracy in reporting.

We welcome you to contact us today.

The post California’s 2026 Baseline Packaging Data Reports appeared first on Reverse Logistics Group.

EU Battery Regulation 2024–2027 Outlook

caroline.houghton@valpak.co.uk — Thu, 27 Nov 2025 12:52:22 +0000

The EU is rolling out new rules for batteries over the next few years. These changes will affect electric vehicles, industrial batteries, LMT, SLI and even small portable batteries. The goal is to make batteries safer, easier to recycle, and more transparent for consumers. Companies that prepare early will avoid delays and potential fines.

CE Marking and Battery Documentation

Starting in August 2024, all batteries sold in the EU must display a CE marking. If the battery is too small for a label, the marking must appear on the packaging or in the accompanying documents. This applies to electric vehicle batteries, rechargeable batteries over 2 kilowatt-hours, and light means of transport batteries.

Manufacturers also need to keep records showing how their batteries perform and how long they last. These documents are important for proving compliance. For guidance on this process, RLG’s battery compliance services cover CE marking and documentation support.

Carbon Footprint Requirements

The EU has planned carbon footprint declarations for electric vehicle batteries. Originally expected in February 2025, this has been delayed until the calculation method is finalized. Once published, manufacturers will have 12 months to comply.

In 2026, the requirement will expand to include rechargeable industrial batteries over 2 kilowatt-hours, except those that are externally stored. Companies can prepare by working with RLG.

New Battery Regulation from August 2025

The EU Battery Regulation 2023/1542 replaces the 2006 directive. The new rules apply directly across EU member states.

Some key points include:

Producers, including those selling second-life batteries, must register in every country where their batteries are sold.

All batteries need the crossed-out wheeled bin symbol for separate collection.

Distributors must provide free take-back for used batteries, even for online sales.

RLG’s battery compliance service can help companies understand and meet these requirements.

Labels, QR Codes, and Battery Passports

From August 2026, batteries will need labels that include the manufacturer, chemistry, weight, capacity, and manufacturing date. Portable batteries should also display lifespan information, and non-rechargeable batteries must be clearly labeled. EV batteries will need carbon footprint information on their labels. In addition, all batteries must bear general mandatory information such as chemical composition and any hazardous substances present. Manufacturers will also be required to draw up an EU Declaration of Conformity in line with Annex IX.

By February 2027, batteries will require a QR code linking to a battery passport. This passport contains details about the model, individual battery history, and recycling information. Portable and LMT batteries must be removable by the user. EV and industrial batteries should be serviceable by trained professionals. All QR codes must link to a unique battery identifier assigned by the economic operator. Companies can receive support for implementing these changes from RLG’s battery compliance service.

Due Diligence for Critical Materials

By August 2027, manufacturers and suppliers must follow due diligence rules for cobalt, lithium, nickel, and natural graphite. This includes monitoring suppliers, managing risks, and reporting environmental and social impacts. Records must be kept for 10 years.

Conclusion

The new EU Battery Regulation brings major changes to the industry. Because the Regulation applies directly in all EU Member States and covers every organization placing batteries on the EU market – including those supplying second-life batteries – businesses will need to review their internal procedures. Early preparation for CE marking, labelling, carbon footprint reporting, and due diligence will help companies stay compliant. Businesses can also gain practical compliance support to navigate the new rules smoothly.

The post EU Battery Regulation 2024–2027 Outlook appeared first on Reverse Logistics Group.

Textile EPR Requirements in the Netherlands

caroline.houghton@valpak.co.uk — Fri, 07 Nov 2025 11:28:41 +0000

The textile industry continues to play a central role in daily life but also faces significant global environmental changes. In the Netherlands, over 50% of textiles still end up in household waste bins. With production and sales on the rise, managing this impact remains a priority for businesses seeking to meet Netherlands Textiles Compliance requirements and contribute to a more circular economy.

To support a more sustainable future, the Netherlands has implemented the Textiles Decree requiring businesses to meet specific reuse and recycling targets under the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regulations. These measures are a vital step toward building a circular textile economy and aligning with the country’s sustainability vision for 2050. Beyond compliance, they offer companies an opportunity to innovate, reduce waste, and strengthen their environmental credentials.

Netherlands Textiles Progress in 2025

As 2025 ends, it’s a good time to see how the textile industry is doing on sustainability. This year, half of all textiles by weight should be reused or recycled. Of that, about 20% should be reused—10% of it within the Netherlands and a quarter should come from recycled fibre. These targets increase gradually over time.

Working toward them has prompted companies to rethink how they make and handle textiles, try out new circular solutions, and cooperate more across the supply chain. Businesses that do this are not just helping the environment; they’re also staying competitive in a market that cares about sustainability.

Who Must Comply with the Netherlands Textiles EPR Regulations?

The Netherlands’ Textiles EPR regulations apply to any organization that first brings household textiles or clothing to the Dutch market, whether as a manufacturer, brand, or importer. This includes businesses operating within the Netherlands as well as those based abroad. The regulations cover a broad range of textile products, reflecting the country’s commitment to promoting reuse, recycling, and circularity in the textile sector. Detailed compliance requirements are typically determined through RLG’s in-depth EPR assessments tailored to each organization’s specific activities.

Navigating Netherlands Textiles Compliance

Textile producers in the Netherlands play a central role in creating a circular textile economy. This requires textiles to be collected and processed separately, with items returned free of charge at collection points nationwide. Businesses can comply individually or through a compliance scheme, which provides financial and organizational support and simplifies reporting and collection processes.

Annual reporting remains essential for tracking compliance progress. Initial reports from 2023 and 2024 focused on product types and quantities, forming the foundation for continued improvement. By following these steps, companies contribute to a more resilient and circular textile sector while benefiting from a structured compliance framework.

How RLG Can Support Your Netherlands Textiles Compliance Journey

Managing Extended Producer Responsibility obligations in the Netherlands can feel complicated, but RLG makes it straightforward. Our Textiles EPR services are designed to help businesses meet regulatory requirements while also enhancing sustainability performance.

Horizon Scanning: Keeping up with changing regulations is challenging. Our team monitors developments in Netherlands Textiles EPR legislation and provides insights you can act on immediately. This proactive approach helps reduce risk and keeps your business ahead of compliance deadlines.

Data Management: Compliance reporting often involves complex datasets from multiple sources. We simplify this process, turning data into clear, actionable information. This not only ensures accurate adherence to Netherlands Textiles Compliance standards but also improves operational efficiency.

Environmental Compliance: Whether you require full-service guidance or targeted assistance, RLG’s global Producer Responsibility Organisation helps streamline every step of compliance. From meeting reuse and recycling targets to reporting obligations, we make it easier for businesses to achieve their environmental goals.

As 2025 comes to a close, many companies are reviewing of how far they’ve come in building a circular textile economy. Textiles are now part of the EU Waste Framework Directive, which means similar rules on producer responsibility will start appearing across Europe. For businesses in the Netherlands, following the Textiles EPR rules is becoming a normal part of operations, from reporting to adopting more sustainable practices. Working with experts like RLG can make this process smoother, helping companies stay on track while planning for upcoming changes in Europe’s textiles regulations.

The post Textile EPR Requirements in the Netherlands appeared first on Reverse Logistics Group.

FAQ’s on How Technology Powers Accurate Scope 3 Reporting

caroline.houghton@valpak.co.uk — Tue, 04 Nov 2025 10:33:39 +0000

Scope 3 emissions reporting is challenging due to its complexity. We spoke with the team behind Scope 3 Insights to learn how their platform simplifies it by combining high-performance technology and data collection.

1. What’s the biggest challenge companies face when tracking their Scope 3 emissions today?

The fundamental problem is that while materials move through supply chains in real-time, the data about their environmental impact moves at the speed of paperwork. Companies are stuck using manual spreadsheets and spend-based estimates rather than actual supplier data. They’re making sustainability decisions based on guesswork rather than real operational data.

2. How does Scope 3 Insights solve this data challenge differently?

Scope 3 Insights is a solution that turns logistics operations into live sustainability intelligence. Instead of asking companies to provide their data like other tools, we capture it automatically as operations happen through direct integration with Order Management systems. When a truck picks up 2.3 tons of electronic waste and drives 47 kilometers to a recycling facility, Scope 3 Insights calculates those exact transport emissions and assigns them to the customer account, so no manual entry is required.

3. Can you explain Scope 3 Insights data architecture in simple terms?

Scope 3 Insights operates on material weights, GPS-accurate distances, vehicle types, facility locations, facility energy consumption, treatment processes, and what we call a “Dual-Stream Data Architecture.” Stream 1 captures live operational data automatically pulled from existing logistics systems. Stream 2 gathers data through our smart questionnaire system. When these streams combine, you get complete, accurate, activity-based emissions data across your entire value chain.

4. What makes RLG’s data collection advanced?

Most platforms provide calculation frameworks but force customers to collect their data, leading to inaccurate spend-based estimates. Scope 3 Insights provides both the methodology and the operational data. We’re directly integrated with our Order Management systems, so you get precise emissions data with complete material flow visibility instead of estimates. It’s like the difference between reading about a recipe and having the ingredients delivered to your kitchen.

5. How does Scope 3 Insights handle real-time data processing at scale?

We built Scope 3 Insights on Microsoft Azure’s cloud platform using a microservices architecture with containerised calculation engines. This means the system automatically scales during peak reporting periods, dashboards load in under 3 seconds and guarantees 99.99% availability. Our event-driven processing handles multiple simultaneous data streams while maintaining API response times under 500 milliseconds.

6. Getting data from suppliers is notoriously tricky. How has Scope 3 Insights solved this?

Traditional approaches burden suppliers with complex spreadsheets and technical jargon. We use progressive disclosure design, and information is presented in bite-sized, logical sections so suppliers aren’t overwhelmed. They’re guided through a conversation about their operations rather than faced with an intimidating technical form.

7. How do your supplier questionnaires combine usability with data quality?

Our questionnaires are designed for ease and accuracy. Real-time validation catches errors instantly, while multilingual, device-friendly interfaces and partial-save features let suppliers complete forms anytime, anywhere. Contextual guidance makes each step clear. At the same time, built-in checks on data types and ranges ensure submissions are accurate and ready for emissions calculations. It’s more than software; it’s innovative supplier relationship management.

8. What enterprise-grade capabilities does Scope 3 Insights offer?

Scope 3 Insights is built on Microsoft Azure with ISO 27001-certified security management, GDPR compliant by design, and end-to-end encryption for all data. We offer API-first architecture for seamless integration with existing sustainability and ERP systems. The platform includes role-based access control, automated data lineage for audit trails, and automated scaling that handles peak reporting demands without performance degradation.

9. How does Scope 3 Insights transform raw data into actionable insights?

We use Microsoft Power BI analytics to transform emissions data into strategic intelligence. With just a few clicks, users can drill down from total emissions to specific materials, suppliers, or periods. Our supplier benchmarking feature compares performance across emissions intensity and recycling rates. The scenario modeling capability lets you test “what-if” situations like shifting 20% more material to mechanical recycling and see the impact of emissions before making operational changes.

10. What about system reliability and disaster recovery?

Scope 3 Insights maintains 99.99% availability through Azure’s global infrastructure with active-passive disaster recovery. We use geo-redundant storage and automated failover scripts, and we maintain a recovery time objective of 4 hours with near-zero data loss. Regular disaster recovery drills ensure we’re always prepared, and our hybrid architecture ensures business continuity even during cloud connectivity issues.

11. What’s the return on investment for implementing Scope 3 Insights?

Scope 3 Insights delivers value across three dimensions. Compliance ROI includes avoiding potential fines in CSRD non-compliance and reducing audit costs through automated reporting. Operational ROI comes from identifying emission reduction opportunities and optimizing logistics routes using real-time data. Strategic ROI includes meeting investor ESG requirements and winning sustainability-focused tenders with comprehensive Scope 3 reporting.

12. In one statement, why should organizations choose Scope 3 Insights?

Scope 3 Insights is a platform that combines real-time operational data, waste management expertise, and enterprise-grade technology to transform Scope 3 compliance from a regulatory burden into a competitive advantage. It delivers the precise, auditable emissions data that CSRD requires while enabling the strategic insights to drive meaningful decarbonization and business value.

The post FAQ’s on How Technology Powers Accurate Scope 3 Reporting appeared first on Reverse Logistics Group.

Italy Targets 2026 Launch for National Textile EPR

Georg Empl — Wed, 29 Oct 2025 17:13:37 +0000

Environmental Ministry commitment signals major step toward Textile EPR, with ReDress Italy leading preparations for implementation.

Turin – October 29, 2025. The Italian Ministry of the Environment has committed to introducing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) legislation for textiles by the first quarter of 2026. Laura D’Aprile, Head of the Department for Sustainable Development at the Ministry of the Environment and Energy Security (MASE), made the announcement on October 24 at the Venice Sustainable Fashion Forum.

The confirmation represents a crucial step in Italy’s transition toward a more circular textile economy. Earlier this year, MASE launched a public consultation on the draft decree. The proposal establishes an EPR system for textiles, covering apparel, footwear, accessories, leather goods, and home textiles.

ReDress Italy welcomes the Ministry’s commitment

ReDress Italy, Reconomy’s Producer Responsibility Organisation (PRO) for Textile EPR in Italy, has welcomed this milestone. It recognises it as a clear signal of Italy’s dedication to implementing practical and measurable sustainability actions within the textile sector. Moreover, it demonstrates growing alignment between public institutions and industry stakeholders.

“Even though the PROs have not yet been formally recognised, they are already working to build the infrastructure needed to implement textile EPR by 2026,” said Sara Faccioli, President of the Board of ReDress and Managing Director of RLG Systems Italia. She added, “ReDress is proposing the creation of an operational working group, coordinated by the Ministry, to move forward in a structured and effective way.”

2026 Textile EPR in Italy aligns with EU circular economy goals

As a result, establishing a national EPR system for textiles positions Italy among the frontrunners in Europe. The initiative aligns with EU ambitions for sustainable product design, waste reduction, and circular business models. Furthermore, by integrating producers, recyclers, and policymakers, the system aims to drive innovation, accountability, and measurable environmental impact across the textile value chain.

Backed by RLG, ReDress Italy supports producers in meeting their environmental obligations and contributes to building circular systems for collecting, sorting, reusing, and recycling. As the regulatory framework takes shape, ReDress will continue collaborating closely with public institutions and industry stakeholders. Together, they are moving toward a fully operational EPR system in 2026.

Contacts:

Aimee Campanella – Development Director – Textiles EPR

Aimee.Campanella@reconomy.com

Lavi Aharon – Director of Textile Program and Business Development

Lavi.Aharon@reconomy.com

The post Italy Targets 2026 Launch for National Textile EPR appeared first on Reverse Logistics Group.

EPR Compliance Drives MedTech Market Access

caroline.houghton@valpak.co.uk — Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:57:01 +0000

Sustainability is becoming an increasingly important topic in the healthcare sector, and MedTech manufacturers and distributors are navigating a complex environment to meet it responsibly. Medical equipment often includes electronics (WEEE), batteries, packaging, and sometimes hazardous or infectious materials. Each of these may fall under different, and sometimes overlapping, EPR requirements, which can make medical device waste management a real challenge. Handling biohazardous waste safely, keeping up with multiple regulations, and managing operational demands are all part of the picture.

Under frameworks like the EU Waste Framework Directive and national EPR laws, medical device producers must ensure proper product stewardship. These frameworks aim to guide companies in managing the environmental impact of their products from production, recycling, take-back processes, through end-of-life, helping them meet regulatory obligations while also supporting more sustainable practices.

Why EPR Compliance Matters for MedTech Companies

For MedTech companies, following environmental rules isn’t just about avoiding fines; it’s also about contributing to a healthier environment and supporting stakeholders who rely on their products – a step towards a circular economy. Hospitals and clinics are increasingly seeking sustainable practices when selecting producers and suppliers, so demonstrating a genuine commitment to sustainability can be a significant advantage.

Managing your environmental compliance obligations also helps manage risk: Global supply chains are under scrutiny, and meeting waste and recycling obligations protects both a company’s reputation and its bottom line. As EPR frameworks expand across Europe and beyond, producers who take proactive steps now will be better positioned to succeed in the future while making a positive impact on people and the planet.

How MedTech Producers Can Achieve EPR Compliance

Handling product and sales data is often the trickiest part of a global EPR strategy. EPR reporting for medical devices begins with understanding your data before you can actually start producer registrations. Knowing what materials, packaging, and waste streams your products involve is essential, but it can get complicated when multiple EPR regulations apply across different European or worldwide countries. We make this easier through a standardized and centralized reporting mechanism, so you only need one data file per waste stream instead of juggling different formats for each country.

We help manage complex product information and transactional data across different requirements, ensuring nothing gets missed.

Keeping up with changing regulations is another challenge. We provide personalized updates whenever laws applying to your products and import streams change and clearly explain what actions are needed in real-time, so you can stay on top of legislation. Audit readiness is included as part of the process; with all the documentation you need to confidently handle regulator checks.

To simplify the EPR registration process, we follow a four-step checklist:

Product Obligation Mapping – We classify medical devices, sterile packaging, and embedded batteries according to country-specific rules. Each product’s obligation is summarized in a detailed report.
Local Producer Registration – We assist with registration with compliance schemes and authorities. We manage external contracts and the Setup process through Power of Attorney.
Data Centralization and Validation – We support understanding, preparing, and submitting data about your products and sales volume. This includes defining reporting standards, integrating information, running test reports, and ensuring accuracy across multiple reporting categories.
Proactive Monitoring – We continuously monitor local laws and obligations, implement necessary data adaptations and volume reporting deadlines, support pre-financing, audits, and provide ad-hoc consulting assistance whenever needed.

Following this approach guarantees medical equipment producers stay in control of environmental compliance, reduce operational workload, and lower the risk of errors or penalties.

The Future of EPR in Medical Device Sustainability

Environmental compliance and EPR have an impact on MedTech manufacturers’ products and daily processes. Producers and distributors that see these as opportunities rather than hurdles can build trust, resilience, and long-term value with both customers and retailers. By combining innovation with responsibility, MedTech can keep improving patient outcomes while also protecting the planet. At RLG, we help producers navigate EPR compliance with practical solutions and expert support. Contact us today for support in simplifying EPR compliance with your medical devices across Europe.

The post EPR Compliance Drives MedTech Market Access appeared first on Reverse Logistics Group.